Fuel Crisis: Car dependence & Environmental Impact
...
...

Argument: How Australia’s car-dependent urban policy model and heavy reliance on imports for fuel expose Australian cities and the national economy to significant risks from global disruptions. This dependence is highlighted by the supply shocks in the Strait of Hormuz, significantly disrupting global supply flows. Revealing major gaps in Australia’s domestic production, reliance on imports, and urban planning.
MLA
I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.
CHIGACO
I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.
APA
I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.
Fuel Crisis: Car dependence & Environmental Impact
Car-Centric Development and Energy Insecurity in Australia
Introduction:
Australia's economy has developed into a leading world economy, projected to reach $2.12 Trillion USD in 2026 (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2025). Leading in key sectors such as international trade, science, technology, and healthcare (Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2022). The country’s rapid economic and population growth has also fuelled a strong emphasis on a car-centric urban planning model, leading to urban sprawl and high dependence on light vehicles.
Around 70–76% of Australia’s population lives in major cities (Australia State of the Environment, 2021). However, this high level of urban concentration in the case of Australian urban centres does not correlate with high population density. Australian cities have been characterised by urban sprawl and relatively low-density development, which reinforces and perpetuates strong reliance on cars and construction of car-centric infrastructure (Spencer et al., 2015). Favouring light vehicles as the primary mode of transportation has revealed vulnerabilities in the Australian economy and infrastructure, most importantly, the increasing reliance on imports of fuel.
While loose urban development policies allow for urban sprawl and car-centric infrastructure, the Australian mentality and preference for single-unit housing with land exacerbate these issues further, as it is ingrained into the “Australian Dream” (Nerida Conisbee, 2017). This is compounded by continued population growth, with the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2025) reporting a net overseas migration gain of 556,000 people in the 2023–2024 financial year. This raises the question: How does the Australian government address the housing crisis and climate policy while developing its economy to become more self-sufficient and less reliant on imports for its essential economic activities?
To address it, this brief will first examine how underdeveloped domestic urban infrastructure, coupled with Australian foreign policy favouring imports of fuel in particular, leaves Australia vulnerable to foreign events. It will then analyse the environmental and climate security risks associated with urban sprawl and car-centric infrastructure.
Underdeveloped Australian domestic infrastructure and policy failure
Australia’s international fuel vulnerability can be traced to how its infrastructure is designed. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics Transport Consensus, 91.3 % of households reported having at least one vehicle, and 55.1 % reported having two or more vehicles (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021). This illustrates the scale of how dominant light-vehicle ownership is in Australian society, which also reflects the infrastructure, prioritising car-centric urban design and facilitating urban sprawl through car ownership. Light vehicles such as cars are also reported to be the most popular mode of transport to get to work in every state and territory in Australia, accounting for 52.7 % of the Australian workforce solely driving to work in 2016 (Australian Bureau of Statistics Transport: Census, 2021). This highlights the daily usage of cars in Australian contexts where private vehicles play a central role in daily transport. The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ Survey of Motor Vehicle Use in 2020 revealed that Australia’s fleet of approximately 19.77 million light vehicles collectively consumed around 33,019 megalitres of fuel, which equates to an average of roughly 1,670 litres of fuel per vehicle for the year. This reflects the nationwide reliance on cars for commuting, work, education, and essential activities while also exposing a key vulnerability: the heavy reliance on fuel. Given Australia's very limited capacity in producing its own fuel domestically, only having 4 oil refineries currently operating, which are unable to meet domestic demand (Parliament of Australia: Oil refineries and fuel security, 2020).
Australia’s underdeveloped oil refineries and heavy dependence on fuel imports make the country particularly vulnerable to external shocks and global instability. Past policy decisions neglected the development of Australia’s domestic oil refineries, instead investing in foreign partnerships with Asian refineries due to their lower cost and convenience. As a result, Australia now imports a large share of its refined fuel. According to the 2026 Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, “Australia imports 87% of its diesel and is the world’s largest diesel importer.” (Denis-Ryan, 2026, p. 1). Much of this diesel must travel long distances through complex and potentially vulnerable international supply chains. This is particularly alarming as 1/3 of oil barrels traded globally pass through the Strait of Hormuz, averaging 21 million barrels per day (Carter et al., 2022, p. 13). This dependence has significant implications for Australia’s economy and overall productivity, particularly as 91 per cent of all fuel consumed in the country is imported (Carter et al., 2022, p. 4). As seen in Australia, because fuel is a vital input for transport, agriculture, and many industrial sectors, any disruption of international trade or global conflict affecting key maritime corridors like the Strait of Hormuz has significantly impacted supply chains or driven up global oil prices (Soliman Hunter & Taylor, 2021). These directly affected operating costs across multiple industries, contributing to price volatility and fuel shortages. The alternative would be for Australia to implement policies that encourage investment in developing its own oil refineries. Meeting the nation’s high demand would take considerable time, and such a shift could also strain relationships with existing foreign partners (Soliman Hunter & Taylor, 2021).
Climate Security Risks
Beyond the international implications, Australia’s car-centric urban planning and infrastructure also pose significant environmental risks. Reliance on light-vehicle transportation systems contributes substantially to global CO₂ emissions. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021), transport “accounted for 23% of global energy-related CO2 emissions. 70% of direct transport emissions came from road vehicles” (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2021, p. 1674). This is particularly alarming given Australia’s heavy reliance on cars for everyday activities, with infrastructure largely designed to prioritise and accommodate private vehicle use. This, in turn, encourages urban sprawl and longer commutes due to the further distances. This reduces the practicality of alternative transport modes, such as walking, cycling, and public transport, which become less efficient and less accessible over greater distances. As a result, reliance on private cars is further reinforced as the most viable mode of transport, further feeding back into car dependence (Miner et al., 2024).
Moreover, to facilitate the tremendous car ownership in Australia, 91.3% (Australian Bureau of Statistics Transport: Census, 2021), Australian urban spaces need to build sufficient automobility infrastructure, including street parking and parking lots. Activities involved in the construction and maintenance of this infrastructure generate large amounts of carbon emissions. A study in Spain estimated roadway life cycle emissions at 8880 to 50,300 t of CO2e per km (Barandica et al., 2013). This underscores that all aspects of car-centric infrastructure, from car usage, road maintenance and parking maintenance, are carbon-intensive processes, exacerbating climate change and the environmental issues. This is particularly relevant in Australia’s urban design philosophy as it prioritises private light vehicles over more sustainable alternatives (Miner et al., 2024).
Ultimately, heavy car reliance and urban planning centred around cars create the urban heat island effect, increasing local temperatures and consequently driving higher energy demand for cooling. At the same time, it allocates significant land to parking infrastructure and replaces carbon-sequestering natural spaces with concrete surfaces, which further reduces green space and intensifies environmental pressures.
Policy Recommendations and Global Implications
This brief underscores that Australia’s car-dependent urban structure and limited domestic refining capacity have created a heavy reliance on imported refined fuels, exposing the national economy and security to global supply shocks and geopolitical instability. Addressing this challenge requires greater accountability across urban planning, policy frameworks, and domestic fuel infrastructure, reframing them as components of a broader transnational energy security issue shaped by global oil markets, maritime chokepoints, and multinational supply chains. The relatively fragmented policy approach of the Australian federal government and state governments has allowed these interconnected domestic and international vulnerabilities to persist.
Global events such as disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-third of global oil trade passes, highlight how deeply embedded and dependent Australia remains within fragile international fuel networks, despite its geographic isolation (Carter et al., 2022, p. 13). In response, state actors, including the federal, state, and territory governments, should collaborate with sustainability- and climate-focused NGOs to guide investment and policymaking. This includes reshaping urban infrastructure, strengthening domestic refining capacity, and reducing dependence on imported fuels, thereby improving resilience to external shocks.
Australia can draw on existing international policy frameworks developed by intergovernmental organisations such as the United Nations Paris Agreement, the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, and OECD Environment guidelines as a foundation for policy reform. However, as Australia faces distinct geographic, social, and environmental conditions, these frameworks should be adapted rather than adopted wholesale. Developing a tailored national strategy that reduces car dependence, promotes more sustainable urban design, and aligns with climate objectives will be critical to enhancing both energy security and environmental outcomes.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Survey of motor vehicle use, Australia. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/tourism-and-transport/survey-motor-vehicle-use-australia/latest-release
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Transport: Census. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/tourism-and-transport/transport-census/latest-release
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2025a). Australian national accounts: National income, expenditure and product. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/national-accounts/australian-national-accounts-national-income-expenditure-and-product/dec-2025
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2025b). Overseas migration: Statistics on Australia's international migration, by state and territory, country of birth, visa, age and sex. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/overseas-migration/latest-release
Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. (2022). Australia is a top 20 country in science, innovation and technology. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/australia-is-a-top-20-country-science-innovation-technology.pdf
Barandica, J. M., Fernández-Sánchez, G., Berzosa, Á., Delgado, J. A., & Acosta, F. J. (2013). Applying life cycle thinking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.036
Carter, L., Quicke, A., & Armistead, A. (2022). Over a barrel: Addressing Australia’s liquid fuel security. The Australia Institute. https://australiainstitute.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/P1036-Over-a-barrel_liquid-fuel-security-WEB.pdf
Charelishvili, A. (2024). From pasture to pavement: Urban expansion and its environmental consequences in Perth (Bachelor’s thesis, Fordham University). Fordham University Digital Research Repository. https://research.library.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=environ_2015
Conisbee, N. (2017). Greater density or urban sprawl. The University of Melbourne. https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/greater-density-or-urban-sprawl
Denis-Ryan, A. (2026). Managing Australia’s diesel squeeze. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis. https://ieefa.org/sites/default/files/2026-04/BN_Managing%20Australia%27s%20diesel%20squeeze_Apr26.pdf
Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications and the Arts. (2024). National urban policy. Australian Government. https://doi.org/10.31046/anztla.v0i23.1529
Huang, M.-T., & Zhai, P.-M. (2021). Achieving Paris Agreement temperature goals requires carbon neutrality by mid-century with far-reaching transitions in the whole society. Advances in Climate Change Research, 12(2), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2021.03.004
Miner, P., Smith, B. M., Jani, A., McNeill, G., & Gathorne-Hardy, A. (2024). Car harm: A global review of automobility’s harm to people and the environment. Journal of Transport Geography, 115, 103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103817
Parison, S., Chaumont, M., Kounkou-Arnaud, R., Long, F., Bernik, A., Da Silva, M., & Hendel, M. (2023). The effects of greening a parking lot as a heat mitigation strategy on outdoor thermal stress using fixed and mobile measurements: Case-study project “tertiary forest.” Sustainable Cities and Society, 98, 104818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104818
Parliament of Australia. (2020). Oil refineries and fuel security. Parliamentary Library. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Research/FlagPost/2020/December/Oil_refineries_and_fuel_security
Population and buildings: Australia state of the environment 2021. (2021). Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. https://soe.dcceew.gov.au/urban/environment/population-and-buildings
Reserve Bank of Australia. (2017). Households’ investment property exposures: Insights from tax data. In Financial stability review (Box B). https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/fsr/2017/oct/box-b.html
Soliman Hunter, T., & Taylor, M. (2021). Long-term and short-term liquid fuel security in Australia: What role for the Great Australian Bight? Energy Policy, 157, 112472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112472
Spencer, A., Gill, J., & Schmahmann, L. (2015). Urban or suburban? Examining the density of Australian cities in a global context. State of Australian Cities National Conference (SOAC 7). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341548815_Urban_or_suburban_Examining_the_density_of_Australian_cities_in_a_global_context
